French Open • Round of 32 • Clay • PLAYED May 30, 2026
Iva Jovic vs Naomi Osaka: Result & Final Score
FINAL · Osaka 7-6 6-7 6-4
Final May 30, 2026 final score
Iva Jovic (serving) 674
Naomi Osaka (winner) (serving) 766 Match Summary
How the match was won, set by set – the better number on each line is marked.
Naomi Osaka beat Iva Jovic 7-6 6-7 6-4: 12 aces, 3 of 6 break points, 51% of all points.
Iva Jovic | Statistic | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Aces | 12 |
| 4 | Double Faults | 2 |
| 60% | 1st serve percentage | 64% |
| 52/68 76% | 1st serve points won | 55/70 79% |
| 23/46 50% | 2nd serve points won | 20/40 50% |
| 2/3 67% | Break Points Converted | 3/6 50% |
| 3/6 50% | Break Points Saved | 1/3 33% |
| 75/114 66% | Service Points Won | 75/110 68% |
| 15/70 21% | 1st return points won | 16/68 24% |
| 20/40 50% | 2nd return points won | 23/46 50% |
| 35/110 32% | Return Points Won | 39/114 34% |
| 110/224 49% | Total Points Won | 114/224 51% |
| 14/17 82% | Service games won | 15/17 88% |
| 2/17 12% | Return games won | 3/17 18% |
| 16/34 47% | Total games won | 18/34 53% |
| 0/0 0% | Net points won | 0/0 0% |
| 34 | Unforced errors | 47 |
| 28 | Winners | 46 |
Iva Jovic | Statistic | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Aces | 4 |
| 2 | Double Faults | 1 |
| 64% | 1st serve percentage | 57% |
| 21/30 70% | 1st serve points won | 20/27 74% |
| 9/17 53% | 2nd serve points won | 11/20 55% |
| 1/2 50% | Break Points Converted | 1/3 33% |
| 2/3 67% | Break Points Saved | 1/2 50% |
| 30/47 64% | Service Points Won | 31/47 66% |
| 7/27 26% | 1st return points won | 9/30 30% |
| 9/20 45% | 2nd return points won | 8/17 47% |
| 16/47 34% | Return Points Won | 17/47 36% |
| 46/94 49% | Total Points Won | 48/94 51% |
| 5/6 83% | Service games won | 5/6 83% |
| 1/6 17% | Return games won | 1/6 17% |
| 6/12 50% | Total games won | 6/12 50% |
| 0/0 0% | Net points won | 0/0 0% |
| 16 | Unforced errors | 19 |
| 12 | Winners | 17 |
Iva Jovic | Statistic | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Aces | 4 |
| 1 | Double Faults | 0 |
| 68% | 1st serve percentage | 69% |
| 21/26 81% | 1st serve points won | 18/24 75% |
| 5/12 42% | 2nd serve points won | 5/11 45% |
| 1/1 100% | Break Points Converted | 1/2 50% |
| 1/2 50% | Break Points Saved | 0/1 0% |
| 26/38 68% | Service Points Won | 23/35 66% |
| 6/24 25% | 1st return points won | 5/26 19% |
| 6/11 55% | 2nd return points won | 7/12 58% |
| 12/35 34% | Return Points Won | 12/38 32% |
| 38/73 52% | Total Points Won | 35/73 48% |
| 5/6 83% | Service games won | 5/6 83% |
| 1/6 17% | Return games won | 1/6 17% |
| 6/12 50% | Total games won | 6/12 50% |
| 7 | Unforced errors | 18 |
| 7 | Winners | 12 |
Iva Jovic | Statistic | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Aces | 4 |
| 1 | Double Faults | 1 |
| 41% | 1st serve percentage | 68% |
| 10/12 83% | 1st serve points won | 17/19 89% |
| 9/17 53% | 2nd serve points won | 4/9 44% |
| 0/0 0% | Break Points Converted | 1/1 100% |
| 0/1 0% | Break Points Saved | 0/0 0% |
| 19/29 66% | Service Points Won | 21/28 75% |
| 2/19 11% | 1st return points won | 2/12 17% |
| 5/9 56% | 2nd return points won | 8/17 47% |
| 7/28 25% | Return Points Won | 10/29 34% |
| 26/57 46% | Total Points Won | 31/57 54% |
| 4/5 80% | Service games won | 5/5 100% |
| 0/5 0% | Return games won | 1/5 20% |
| 4/10 40% | Total games won | 6/10 60% |
| 11 | Unforced errors | 10 |
| 9 | Winners | 17 |
Players
Ranking, season record, form and the basics side by side.
Iva Jovic | Fact | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| No. 13 | Current ranking | No. 17 |
| 2,841 | Ranking points | 2,296 |
| 40–19 | 2026 record | 30–11 |
| WLLWW | Last 5 matches | WWLWW |
| 18 | Age | 28 |
| Not on record | Height | 180 cm |
| | Country | Japan |
| Not on record | Turned pro | 2011 |
Past Match-ups
Their most recent completed meetings, latest first.
Head-to-head record not fetched yet.
News & Insights
What is happening around Iva Jovic vs Naomi Osaka - headlines from our approved sources, links go to the source.
No headlines about this match from our sources yet - stories land here as soon as they are published.